Perhaps the biggest mistake law students make is using their writing skills to answer problematic questions. Thank you for your explanation, but I would like to ask a question, if the question has several problems, you must emphasize in your answers that you use RAIC: Specify the rule of the problem: specify the rule, etc. or you will go further and always answer the question with RAIC, but in the form of an essay The rule is the section of your answer, by using authority. This can be done either by specifying legal provisions or by the relevant case law on the subject. Thank you for your guide, sir. But I would like to ask a question. When we take the exam, do we even have to specify the steps to answer the question in the brochure? specifically. Do we need to clarify the introduction, definition, body and conclusion? Beware of red herring: inspectors sometimes add strange details to scare you. A common trick is to specify a very specific date on which something happened.
This may be the day before or after a particular law comes into force. If so, your entire answer will change. Another trick is to ask the fictional character or client to file an indictment on the matter or take legal action along a certain legal line, which is actually the wrong line of inquiry. Your job is to examine the facts in the problematic issue and analyze them in relation to two key variables: parts and events. So it`s a two-step process. In my first year of law school, so did I. After all, why shouldn`t a problematic question have an introduction and no conclusion? It seems logical to demonstrate your contextual knowledge of the law and show the examiner your thought process in a coherent arc from start to finish. Unfortunately, this only shows a bad conscience of what a problematic issue really is. Problematic questions can help you develop valuable skills to identify relevant information, apply legal principles to specific scenarios, and write advice in a clear and logical way. Here are some tips on how to approach this type of question.
In this article, I will explain how to approach dissertation issues for the benefit of students. What I`m going to discuss, however, is the general rule that depends on what your specific tutor or speaker may require of you. If you understand how to use the RAIC, dealing with the problems will seem less problematic. When you are done with this post, you should be able to put any problem question in its place. Answer the set of questions! Most importantly, you need to make sure that you answer the exact question, with the exact facts you have established. So many students slip because they don`t deal with the issue and end up being distracted and discussing a marginally relevant topic. Your answer is only worth points if it is directly relevant to the problematic question scenario. Look back to make sure you answer the exact set of questions directly. Use the same terminology used in the question to avoid discrepancies. Please, how do you answer this question with the RAIC method? “Emeka, a cashier of the Omenka Cooperative Society, deceived the Society with a huge amount of money. Emeka, who was a first-time offender, immediately offered the money to the police station and asked for forgiveness.
The prosecutor, moved by Emeka`s remorse, advised the company`s president, who had come to report the case, to drop the charges. However, the president insisted that the prosecutor`s office say that the stolen money belonged to the company and that the executive committee had decided to bring the case to a logical conclusion. Notify the parties. “What rule applies and what is the problem? I can`t understand it, sir, you have to define all the elements of a contract when you receive a contract law question Okay! For now, that`s all I can reveal on this topic (How to answer the question about the legal problem). As I rightly mentioned, it is important to always attend classes because the way a particular speaker wants their problematic question to be answered is different from the way another speaker wants it to be. Make a plan or write down the most important facts. Try writing down a few keywords, a mini-mind map of connections, or a mini-timeline (timeline) of events – whichever works best for your learning style. Writing down a few keywords or facts will help you digest the problematic issue. For the same reason, it`s good to come back from time to time and re-read the question as you write your answer. For example, if you were to answer a problematic question about a possible murder, you would begin with a brief description of R v.
Defendant in which the accused killed the victim by stabbing her. They would say that it is a question of whether the accused committed murder and would define the term “murder” legally. They then went through the rules of the actus reus and the mens rea of crime. You would then examine the rules in detail and apply them to the particular facts of the case, using common law examples to illustrate why (or why not) the accused committed murder. They would also consider the details of any objection that might be true. They would then conclude as to the defendant`s prospects. An example of a free PDF guide to answer a GDL homicide test question can be found here. Use the right guides: If you know you are being judged on problematic issues, you should learn and review the law in the same way. In this way, the technique will become second nature to you. Reading a typical set of notes won`t help you apply your knowledge, so we recommend using Law Answered notes. Your LLB and GDL grades intentionally use problematic question structures (and other sketches of exam answers) to help you learn the topic in the same way you need to apply it. The essays are designed to critically analyze the law and the academic opinion associated with it, and to throw your own thoughts into a form of written debate.
Whereas when it comes to problematic issues, you are not engaging in a verbal battle of opinion, but in a structured application of the law to a set of facts. In other words, your goal is not to debate whether a law is good or bad or not, but to advise a fictitious client on their legal responsibilities. Mr Olamide, so I really appreciate it, but in the recital in which you asked to discuss the concept of agreement and satisfaction in terms of taking account of case law? What would be your answer? You are the best solution to our problem as a lawyer thanking you for your lesson Now that we have a structure for our problem-based answer to the problem issue, it is time to turn to the law. A big problem that new law graduates face is the fact that many of them usually have the mindset that the place where they are (university) will be the same as where they come from (high school); And for this reason, they tend not to ask questions about how they should answer their legal questions using the traditional or general method and, ultimately, do not achieve the expected result or even fail. You see, a good understanding of the law makes it quite easy to apply to the facts. By doing the groundwork before you find the problems, understanding the facts of the case, and identifying the law, you can approach the problematic issue with a consistent understanding of the advice you need to give. Your first concern is to determine the problem(s) associated with the issue. This determination includes the question of what is the problem to be solved in this case. Please, how to use it to define the basis of the problematic question about the internal conflict-of-laws rules and the best way to answer the questions To make things clearer, the complete answer to the problematic question would look like this: Despite this, I explained above the generally accepted way to answer legal questions using the RAIC method.